Johannes Bastian Nicol
Lawyer, Associate | Berlin
Data protection law IT law [&] digital business
Johannes Bastian Nicol has been a lawyer at the technology law firm Schürmann Rosenthal Dreyer Rechtsanwälte since 2020 and specialises in data protection law, IT law and digital business.
He advises clients on all legal issues relating to data protection law and the drafting of contracts for various IT projects. He is the first point of contact for the use of standard software and all issues relating to cloud computing and SaaS projects. Clients from the internet and information technology, consumer goods and retail sectors as well as marketing, PR and design trust his expertise.
- Expert in data protection law, advice on all legal issues in data protection law
- Contract drafting for IT projects, customising and use of standard software, data trading and interface use, support for cloud computing and SaaS projects, service contracts
- Data protection law advice in the areas of banking, InsurTech, health [&] medicine and E-commerce
- MA-Risk
- Contract drafting for MA-Risk
- Carrying out data protection impact assessments
- Lawyer at Schürmann Rosenthal Dreyer Rechtsanwälte since 2020
Previously:
- Worked in a Berlin commercial law firm and in the legal department of the e-commerce company Zalando since 2015
- Studied at the Humboldt University of Berlin and the Biligi Üniversitesi Istanbul, 2nd state examination at the Berlin Court of Appeal
-
29.08.22
Schadensersatz nach der DSGVO: die wichtigsten Fragen und Antworten -
26.06.22
Unterlassungsansprüche nach der DSGVO? – Einblicke in die Rechtsprechung und rechtliche Einschätzung -
15.06.22
DSGVO-Schadensersatzverfahren: SRD erzielt Erfolg im Abwehren eines Schadensersatzanspruchs -
07.04.22
Schadensersatzansprüche im Datenschutz – Risiken und Herausforderungen -
30.07.20
DSGVO-Behördenverfahren: Abläufe verstehen und Bußgeldern vorbeugen -
13.02.20
Schadensersatz nach DSGVO: Wer muss was beweisen? -
23.05.19
Vom Datenschutzvorfall zum Bußgeldbescheid: Wie handelt die Aufsichtsbehörde? -
28.04.17
Urteil: Verkauf von Streaming-Boxen mit spezieller Software urheberrechtsverletzend?